Back

IRT Trends for Today and Tomorrow: Insights From a Survey of Clinical Research Executives

Discover the latest trends in IRT
What 100 clinical research leaders told us about delays, amendments, and choosing an IRT provider

Timelines and delays are the top concern in clinical trials

Asked to rank the 3 issues that keep them up at night when running a trial, 61% put timelines and delays in their top 3. Patient recruitment followed at 55%, then data quality (40%) and cost (39%). The two are linked: a slow-enrolling site pushes every downstream milestone, and IRT sits in the middle of that chain.

The biggest IRT issues: delays, flexibility, and vendor trust

On IRT specifically, 62% ranked timelines and delays in their top 3, and 38% ranked it first. No other issue came close to that first-place share. Lack of technology flexibility (41%), trust in the IRT vendor (41%), and protocol amendments (40%) came next.

How long does IRT study startup take?

95% of respondents said it takes at least 4 weeks to start a study on their current IRT platform. 56% said 4 to 6 weeks, and 39% said more than 6. Only 5% reported startup in 1 to 3 weeks. For a sponsor working toward first patient in, those weeks sit on the critical path.

How long do protocol amendments take in IRT?

Amendments are routine. Over the prior 18 months, 44% of respondents saw 1 to 3 per study, 42% saw 4 to 6, and 14% saw more than 6. And 45% said each one takes 4 to 6 weeks to implement in IRT. Across a study with 4 or 5 amendments, the IRT change queue alone can add up to months.

What clinical teams want from a new IRT platform

The wish list maps straight onto the pain points. 61% ranked quick study startup in their top 3, and 58% ranked faster amendment implementation. Cost-effectiveness came next at 48%, followed by system flexibility (37%) and pre-validated configurations that need no custom code (34%).

What matters most when choosing an IRT provider

Data quality leads by a wide margin: 88% rated it important or very important, and 71% chose “very important,” the highest share of any attribute. Ease of use (84%) and the ability to handle changes quickly (81%) came next. Clinical operations drives the decision at 86% of organizations, and 62% want a provider that covers study build, consultative guidance, and UAT support.

Why switching IRT providers is hard

The friction is operational. 82% ranked qualifying a new provider with procurement as a top burden, followed by new third-party integrations (72%), analyzing the market (71%), and losing investment in current customizations (71%). Teams do switch, though. 68% worked with 2 or 3 IRT providers in the past year.

IRT FAQs

What is IRT in clinical trials?

IRT (interactive response technology) manages randomization, treatment assignment, and investigational product supply in a clinical trial. It’s also called RTSM (randomization and trial supply management). Read more in What Is IRT in Clinical Trials?

What are the most common problems with IRT systems?

In YPrime’s survey of 100 clinical research leaders, the top IRT concerns were timelines and delays (62%), lack of technology flexibility (41%), trust in the IRT vendor (41%), and protocol amendments (40%).

How long does it take to set up IRT for a clinical trial?

95% of respondents said IRT startup takes at least 4 weeks on their current platform, and 39% said more than 6 weeks.

How long does a protocol amendment take to implement in IRT?

45% of respondents said 4 to 6 weeks per amendment, and about a third said 1 to 3 weeks. With 56% seeing 4 or more amendments per study, amendment speed has a direct effect on trial timelines.

What should sponsors look for in an IRT provider?

Respondents ranked data quality (88%), ease of use (84%), and the ability to handle changes quickly (81%) as the most important attributes.

Mark Maietta, President, YPrime

Planning an IRT build? The Biotech Sponsor’s Playbook for IRT Success covers the design questions to ask before you commit to a system.

Scroll to Top